I had this Question in mind for like a long time, asked many VCs who answered frankly with lame answers.
Why is it when you get funded from a VC, you implicitly agree that you will eventually sellout your startup to one of the big players, and settle with your cash.
Why have we never had a story of a successful startup that continued to be built to last rather than offered to one of the big players on a silver plater?
How are we going to build a startup nation and have the googles and yahoos of the region if we always end up giving them away to others.
Really want to know the plan behind this.

asked Mar 09 at 08:52

Slayer's gravatar image

Slayer
1163


Well I think from a VC perspective, they're investing in your company to make a profit. They normally want to see that profit in 2-3 years... not 20 years later when you've built a great and lasting business.

While there is benefit from VC investment as many VC investors also have great expertise to share, I'm not a fan of VC money as it tends to cloud judgement and really does shift your strategy to a more materialistic and superficial one (usually). I personally would rather bootstrap and then get a bank loan.

In summary, building a company to last, will not achieve VC investors' short term goals or satisfy what some would consider 'greed'.

answered Mar 09 at 23:21

Hiconomics's gravatar image

Hiconomics
5063

But this is not how sequoia looked at Google. Why don't we have regional VCs who think this way, that long term investments will bring back benefit. It is not stock market with short term sight. I understand that they need to bring their money back, but this should not contradict with them trying to have one story with long term investment, or even better trying to balance between the two.

(Mar 11 at 11:07) Slayer Slayer's gravatar image

One needs to learn how VCs work to better understand their need for exits. VCs don't own the money they invest, they are basically money managers. They create funds by convincing investors (real owners of the money) to invest in their fund, and they promise them to produce great returns within 10 years. Therefore, when VCs invest in startups they want to see a clear exist strategy - usually within 3-5 years - in order to create the returns that they promised their actual investors.

If their portfolio startups do not exit, by the end of their fund (i.e. after 10 years), their investors will be angry, because they are not interested in owning shares in companies, they simply want to see healthy returns on liquid money. This will have severe impact on the VCs compensation for the whole fund management, and will probably prevent them from creating another fund in the future.

answered Apr 15 at 07:54

%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AF%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%8A's gravatar image

عماد المسعودي
1494

Your answer
toggle preview

2010 © YallaStartup, Inc - About

Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License